As well as issuing road safety policy statements and working with government and the media, the IAM RoadSmart Policy & Research Team undertake research into driver behaviour and a range of other road safety issues. Following are a sample of our recent published reports.
Both methods of control were found to significantly distract drivers however, touchscreen control proved to be the more distracting of the two. While many drivers realised the system was causing a distraction and modified their behaviour such as slowing down, performance was still impacted with drivers unable to maintain a constant distance to the vehicle in front, reacting more slowly to sudden occurrences and deviating outside of their lane.
The study also found that using touch control resulted in reaction times that were even worse than texting while driving and drivers would often underestimate just how much their eyes were off the road while using touch control. Touch control also caused drivers to take their eyes off the road for longer than the NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) recommended guidelines.
Many of the participants also found that controlling the car’s lane position as well as keeping a consistent speed headway to the vehicle in front suffered significantly when interacting with their infotainment systems, particularly when using touch control.
While the research does suggest that current systems are performing on a much higher level than they were a few years ago thanks to technological advances, it’s proving to still be a distraction for many drivers and anything that distracts a driver’s eye is estimated as a factor for as many as 30% of all road collisions in Europe each year.
This is why IAM RoadSmart has called on the industry and government to openly test and approve these systems to an agreed standard before they are released.
Read the full report here.